Legal Opinion

Grant v. City of Roanoke

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided July 18, 2017No. Civil Action No. 7:16CV00007Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Glen E. Conrad, Chief United States District Judge

Mark T. Grant, proceeding pro se, filed this action against the City of Roanoke (the “City”), alleging that the City improperly retained $26,257.30 from the sale of certain real property, which was previously rehabilitated for occupancy, using funds made available to the City through the federal HOME Investment Partnerships Program (“HOME Program”). Grant claims that the City violated regulations implementing the HOME Investment Partnerships Act and his constitutional right to due process, and that he is entitled to relief…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API