Legal Opinion

Lahey v. Kingon

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1861PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion by one of two joint judgment-debtors to set aside the judgment. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.

—Since the statute of 1833, in actions against joint-debtors, it was regular, where only one was served with process, to take judgment against both, and enforce such judgment against the joint property of both, and the individual property of the one served.

Section 136 of the Code continues that practice, and authorizes expressly that the judgment may, in such a case, be enforced against the joint property of both, and the separate property of the one served.

That this course was proper was also held by the Supreme Court, in Pardee a. Haynes (10 Wend., 630) ; and it was also decided in that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Binney v. LeGalNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Pardee v. Haynes & MerriamNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  3. Everson v. GehrmanNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Stannard v. MatticeNew York Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. North State Finance Co. v. LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Rufty v. . Claywell, Powell Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API