Legal Opinion

State v. Mohamed

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 28, 2013No. 68061-7-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

¶1 Under RCW 9A.44.100(1)(b), a person is guilty of indecent liberties if he or she “knowingly causes *48another person who is not his or her spouse to have sexual contact with him or her or another . . . [w]hen the other person is incapable of consent by reason of being mentally defective, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless.” A person’s knowledge that the victim is “incapable of consent by reason of being mentally defective, mentally incapacitated, or physically helpless” is not an essential element of this crime. Thus, here, where Mohamaud Mohamed was charged with the crime of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henry Grisby Iii, Resp. v. Robert Herzog, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. State Of Washington v. Adan MoralesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. State Of Washington v. Brandon E. DockterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State Of Washington v. David Francisco RuizCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. State Of Washington v. Robert FordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API