Legal Opinion

People v. Watkins

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 31, 1972No. 70-116PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD

delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendant James Watkins, together with one John Leon Dismuke, was indicted and tried for Armed Robbery. The defendant, James Watkins, separately appeals from a judgment of conviction after a jury verdict and from the sentence of 2-7 years in the penitentiary which was imposed.

Defendant argues that he was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; that he was deprived of a fair trial when the trial court denied his motion for severance and forced him to stand trial with the co-defendant John Leon Dismuke. He also argues…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. Julius L. EchelesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  3. Paul A. Gorin v. United States of America, Henry Grillo v. United States of America, Saul Glassman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
  4. The People v. GardnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  5. The PEOPLE v. CanadayIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. People v. IkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. People v. BeardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. People v. RiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API