Lamkin v. Robinson
Ohio Court of Appeals
Error.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchwalter, J.
These preceeclings in error were brought to reverse a judgment entered in the superior court of Cincinnati in an action wherein John Robinson was plaintiff and Harry G. Lamkin, both as executor of Pearl R. Lamkin and individually, and certain corporations were defendants.
The corporations named as defendants are not interested in the cause, except for the purpose of transferring the shares of stock in controversy as the court may order.
John F. Robinson will hereinafter be designated as plaintiff and Harry G. Lamkin as defendant.
While the action was pending plaintiff died and the cause was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Martin v. . FunkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Robb v. . Washington Jefferson CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Locke v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Lewis v. CurnuttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.