Legal Opinion

United States v. Passman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 10, 1978No. Crim. 78-00159, 78-00211PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BARRINGTON D. PARKER, District Judge:

Former Representative Otto E. Passman currently faces two indictments arising out of his alleged participation in the well-publicized Korean influence-buying scandal. The immediate question to be determined is whether Mr. Passman, now 78 years old and suffering from various ailments, is mentally and physically competent to be arraigned and stand trial. The Court has reviewed the evidence and testimony presented at an exhaustive competency hearing, considered the legal memoranda and argument of counsel, and determines that the defendant is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Bishop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Archibald Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LeachCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  2. United States v. GoldsteinDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1986
  3. United States Ex Rel. Coleman v. HicksDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1980
  4. United States v. PassmanDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1979
  5. United States v. Saltzman, D.O.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API