Legal Opinion

Liscio v. Campbell

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 1, 1929No. 352PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtL. Hand, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). On what theory the plaintiff applied for a decree compelling the administrator to grant him a license pendente lite we cannot understand. Section 6 (27 USCA § 16) is the measure of his rights, and, while it provides for a suit in equity, it does so only by reference to section 5 (27 USCA § 14), which says that “during the pendency of such proceedings” the court “may restrain the manufacture, sale, or other disposition of such article.” Nowhere is it suggested that the court shall issue an ad interim permit; on the contrary, the section presupposes that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Jacob Ruppert v. CaffeySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Ma-King Products Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Lambert v. YellowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Selzman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Commission Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1935
  2. American Denaturing Corp. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Greenberg v. DoranDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930
  4. General Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Bridgeport Broadcasting Station, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1931
  5. Rondinella v. CampbellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API