Legal Opinion · Concurrence

IOS Capital, Inc. v. Phoenix Printing, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 22, 2004No. 4-03-0879Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE COOK,

specially concurring:

I concur in the decision to reverse.

National Acceptance is a troublesome case. National Acceptance recognizes the general rule, that “[o]ne of the purposes of a corporate entity is to immunize the corporate officer from individual liability on contracts entered into in the corporation’s behalf.” National Acceptance, 94 Ill. App. 3d at 706, 418 N.E.2d at 1116-17. That rule is not just a sidelight. The rule is essential and goes to the very reason for the existence of corporations. “Accordingly, in most instances, the law immunizes corporate officers from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Madigan v. TangAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Laroche Industries, Inc. v. AIG Risk Management, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API