Legal Opinion

Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. M/V" OOCL INSPIRATION"

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 3, 1997No. 95 Civ. 10041 RWSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. (“Transatlantic”) has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed. R. Civ. P, to recover a cargo loss. Defendants Sea-Land Service, Inc. (“Sea-Land”), Orient Overseas Container Line (U.K.), Ltd. ( “OOCL” ) and MW OOCL INSPIRATION (the “INSPIRATION”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have cross-moved for summary judgment.

For the reasons set forth below, the Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment will be granted and the Defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment will be denied.

Parties

Transatlantic is a New…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. Lipton v. Nature Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Howard Fink and Lucia Marett v. New York City Department of Personnel, New York City Human Resources Administration and Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Peer International Corp. v. Luna Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. M/V "OOCL Inspiration,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. M/V "Oocl Inspiration"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. American Home Assur. Co. v. Zim JamaicaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API