Legal Opinion
State v. Price
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 26, 1988No. 13361PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy precluded the trial that led to the conviction of the defendant, Edmund J. Price, of the crime of larceny in the sixth degree, as defined in General Statutes § 53a-125b.1 We conclude that it did not, and therefore find no error.
The procedural history of the defendant’s conviction is as follows. The defendant was arrested and charged with larceny in the sixth degree on April 13, 1987. A trial on this charge was originally scheduled for July 7, 1987, but it did not go forward on that day. After…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. SnookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. RuscoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. AlmedaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. HedgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.