Rizzo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; Charles B. Witmer, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Charles Rizzo. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
By the first count of the indictment, Nigro, Carroll and Polino were charged with a violation of the White Slave Traffic Act (36 Stat. 825, Comp. Stat. §§ 8812-8819) in transporting three women from New York to Pennsylvania for the purpose of prostitution. By the second count, Rizzo was charged (under section 332 of the Penal Code, 35 Stat. 1152 [Comp. St. § 10506]), with; the offense of knowingly aiding and abetting the principals in the trans*52.action. Upon evidence establishing both the fact and purpose of transporting the women, the three first named defendants were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Hoke & Economides v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. HolteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Hoss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
3Cited by8 opinions
- Malaga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932
- United States v. Charles Herschel DimsdaleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Talbot v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
- United States ex rel. Sirchie v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
- Cholakos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.