Legal Opinion
Alliance Ins. v. Enders
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1923No. 4008PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in the court below brought four separate actions against four insurance companies on four separate contracts of insurance. The policies and pleadings in the several actions were the same, and by consent of parties the four cases were consolidated for the purposes of trial. Each policy contained the following mortgage,, clause: .
“Loss, if any, on buildings alone, subject, however, to all the terms and conditions of this policy, payable to Fred J. ICiesel estate, mortgagee and assured.”
Also:
“Loss or damage, if any, under this policy on buildings alone, shall…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. v. B. S. Rhea & SonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Pennsylvania Fire Ins. v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1901
- Twin City Fire Ins. v. Stockmen's Nat. Bank of Ft. BentonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- Carroll v. Hartford Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
- Glindemann v. EhrenpfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lewis v. Continental Life and Accident Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Boise Ass'n of Credit Men, Ltd. v. United States Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Continental Ins. Co. of City of New York v. FortnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Gattavara v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Concordia Ins. v. School Dist. No. 98 of Payne CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.