Department of Revenue v. Byrd
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WOLF, Judge.
Petitioners argue that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by directing respondent, petitioner Sickles, and their minor child to undergo DNA testing to determine the child’s paternity seven years after respondent had already been adjudged the legal father of the child. We *1037agree and quash the trial court’s order compelling the DNA tests, with directions that respondent’s motion to compel the tests be denied.
In 1990, respondent was adjudged the legal father of the minor child pursuant to a default final judgment of paternity. In September 1997, he filed a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- STATE ON BEHALF OF CURRENT v. HarrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Morgan v. MorganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- STATE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES v. DayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
3Cited by1 opinion
- Southwick v. State, Department of Revenue ex rel. MulloyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998