Legal Opinion
United States v. Armand Gravely
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 29, 1988No. 87-5579PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
Armand Gravely was charged with one count of conspiring to fix the prices of soft drink products in the Norfolk and Richmond, Virginia areas in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and three counts of obstruction of justice, 18 U.S.C. § 1503. Count III, an obstruction count involving destruction of tapes, was dismissed by the court at the close of the government’s case. On February 12, 1987, after eight days of trial, the jury returned a verdict of guilty on the Sherman Act count and Count II, an obstruction of justice count involving the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- United States v. James Hassan ElCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. RoaneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. BashamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Robert Augustine D'anjou, A/K/A Dennis DennisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.