Legal Opinion

Townsend v. . Bargy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1874PublishedCited by 7 opinions

This was an action to recover possession of personal property. The property claimed was taken from defendant and delivered to plaintiff.

Read the full summary

This was an action to recover possession of personal property. The property claimed was taken from defendant and delivered to plaintiff. The referee found, in substance, that on the 11th of May, 1870, plaintiff executed and delivered to defendant his note, by which he promised to pay defendant sixty days after date, $100, in hemlock shingles, at four dollars per thousand, and, as collateral security, executed and delivered to defendant a chattel mortgage, upon the property in question. The mortgage contained the usual clause authorizing the mort-gagee to take possession at any time when he…

1Opinion of the Court

Earl, C.,

reads for reversal and new trial, unless defendant will modify the judgment so the same will award him for the value of the property, in case return cannot be had, the sum of $31.52; in which case, judgment affirmed, as modified

All concur.

Judgment accordingly.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Toledo v. ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Arter v. JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Sturman v. PolitoRochester City Court · 1936
  4. Brockway Motor Truck Corp. v. SelzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  5. Duffus v. SchwingerNew York Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API