Legal Opinion
Seide v. Gannett Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1964PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClarence H. Brisco, J.
The petitioners request an order restraining and enjoining the respondent, the Gannett Co., Inc., as the publisher of the Democrat and Chronicle newspaper from publishing articles concerning the petitioners, Carl Seide and Sam Accorso, in said newspaper’s current- daily feature on gambling in the City of Rochester on the grounds that such articles, if permitted to be published, would severely prejudice the impending trials on gambling charges of said petitioners and deprive them of a fair and impartial trial. A temporary restraining order was granted by Hon. William G. Easton, a Justice of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Buffalo v. ManganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Wiggins v. Ithaca Journal News, Inc.Ithaca City Court · 1968
- Anonymous v. Buffalo Courier Express, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1969