Legal Opinion

State v. Hendricks

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 17, 2003No. 88,828PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marquardt, J.:

The State appeals the trial court’s grant of Nathan R. Hendricks’ motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.

On October 2, 2001, Officer James Pritchard visited Nathan Hendricks and Erin Viren’s apartment. Officer Pritchard was searching for Nathan’s brother, Otto, who was wanted on a Missouri arrest warrant. Nathan denied knowing Otto’s whereabouts.

On October 3, 2001, Erin told the police where to find Otto. When officers approached Otto, he identified himself as Greg Hendricks and said that Otto was his brother. Only when officers threatened to have Nathan provide Otto’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. SlaterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  4. State v. LockettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. State v. ProbstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. MellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  3. State v. LandisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  4. State v. HensleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. Roberts v. LongDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API