Legal Opinion

Highsmith v. Lair

California Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1955No. L. A. 22941Published

1Opinion of the Court

44 Cal.2d 298 (1955)

RALPH N. HIGHSMITH et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

MAX LAIR et al., Defendants; MORTON D. GOLDBERG et al., Respondents; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant.

L. A. No. 22941.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Apr. 15, 1955.

Laughlin E. Waters, United States Attorney, and Edward R. McHale, Assistant United States Attorney, for Appellant.

Maurice Rose for Respondents.

EDMONDS, J.

The question here presented for decision concerns the scope and effect of notices of tax lien of the United States of America. The appeal is from a judgment holding that the federal government may not recover from…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Glass City Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United States v. AcriSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. United States v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API