Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance Ex Rel. Aetna Life Insurance v. Dawson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 16, 2016No. 15-10510UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”), acting as an assignee, filed a lawsuit in federal district court to enforce its subrogation and reimbursement rights against David Dawson. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Dawson, holding that a prior agreement between Dawson and Continental precluded Continental’s recovery. Because we conclude that the district court misconstrued the parties’ agreement, we REVERSE and REMAND.

I.FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On November 16, 2007, David Dawson was severely injured in the course of his employment with Hill…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Sun Exploration and Production Co. v. BentonTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Quality Infusion Care, Inc. v. Health Care Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Adams v. Petrade International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance Co. v. DawsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2017
  2. Caramba, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API