Legal Opinion

Quinn Construction, Inc. v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 2009No. Civil Action No. 07-406PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

This action concerns a dispute over the construction of Skirkanich Hall at the University of Pennsylvania (“Penn”). Skanska USA Building Inc. (“Skanska”), one of. the defendants, was the general contractor on the Skirkanich Hall project. Plaintiff Quinn Construction Inc. (“Quinn”) was a subcontractor. Quinn has filed a motion to compel the production of a report by one of Skanska’s non-testifying experts on the ground that the report was provided to, and utilized by, one of Skanska’s testifying experts. Skanska has resisted production claiming…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. In Re: Cendant Corporation Securities Litigation Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  5. Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. Dow Argo SciencesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Martensen v. KochDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
  3. Gammons v. Adroit Medical Systems, Inc. (TV2)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API