Legal Opinion
Buonasera v. Honest Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 22, 2016No. 16 Civ. 1125(VM)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge
On April 20, 2016, Brad Buonasera (“Buo-nasera”) filed an amended complaint on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated (collectively “Plaintiffs”), alleging four causes of action against The Honest Company, Inc. (“Honest”): (1) violation of the New York General Business Law Section 349 (“Section 349”); (2) violation of the New York General Business Law Section 350 (“Section 350”); (3) breach of an express warranty; and (4) unjust enrichment. (Dkt. No. 27.)
By letter dated June 6, 2016, Buonasera requested a pre-motion…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re Gse Bonds Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Manier v. L'Oreal U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Alexis Romero, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Central National Gottesman Inc; Samantha Campbell, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Central National Gottesman IncDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Alexis Romero, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Central National Gottesman Inc; Samantha Campbell, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Central National Gottesman IncDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Bernstein v. Cengage Learning, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.