State v. Lovelace
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.
The State of Texas sought forfeiture of $435,000. In its sole point of error, the State contends that the trial court erred in granting the appellee’s motion to dismiss under the Controlled Substances Act, Tex. Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 4476-15 § 5.07(a) (now repealed), because the forfeiture hearing was not held within thirty days of the day an answer was filed. The trial court is affirmed because another panel of this court held that section 5.07(a) is mandatory in Lovelace v. Downey, 783 S.W.2d 824 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, orig. proceeding).
On…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chisholm v. Bewley MillsTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Lewis v. Jacksonville Building & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Markowsky v. NewmanTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- McKee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- State v. CherryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- $80,631.00 v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992