Hoback Ranches, Inc. v. Urroz
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
There having been noneompliance with Rule 54(b), W.R.C.P., in that the crossclaims of the appellant against the State of Wyoming have not been determined, therefore the liabilities of fewer than all of the parties were determined upon issuance of an order granting partial summary judgment, and there being no express determination that there is no just reason for delay. Hayes v. Nielson, Wyo., 568 P.2d 905 (1977); Olmstead v. Cattle, Inc., Wyo., 541 P.2d 49 (1975); Crossan v. Irrigation Development Corp., Wyo., 598 P.2d 812 (1979), pursuant to Rules 1.04 and 1.05 and 16,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crossan v. Irrigation Development Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Olmstead v. Cattle, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Hayes v. NielsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Big Horn River SystemWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Stone v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Amos v. Lincoln County School District No. 2Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Eklund v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Barker Bros., Inc. v. Barker-TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.