Legal Opinion

People v. Gibbons

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1932No. Docket No. 163, Calendar No. 35,907PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Butzel, J'.

John A. Gibbons appeals from a judgment of conviction of assault with intent to commit rape. As only questions of law are raised, it is unnecessary to review the facts. The original information charged that “John A. Gibbons attempted to rape and ravish Lillian Bennett.” At the trial, prior to the introduction of any evidence, and in the absence of the jury, respondent’s attorney moved to quash the information on the ground that the testimony at the examination before the justice showed an attempt to seduce and not to rape. Thereupon the prosecuting attorney was permitted to amend…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  2. People v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Ross v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. McIntoshMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. People v. PriceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. SpringsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API