Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 2001PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wesley, J.

“Buy-and-bust” cases often involve the testimony of an undercover officer. When the People can establish an overrid ing interest that open-court testimony by an undercover officer would jeopardize the officer’s safety, the Trial Judge may close the courtroom during the testimony of that witness. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the posting of a court officer outside the courtroom as a screening device under the circumstances of this case amounts to an “alternative to closure” that implicated defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a public trial.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. State v. NdinaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. People v. EchevarriaNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. People v. FrostNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. People v. MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API