State v. Littlefair

¶1 Peter T. Littlefair appeals his convictions for manufacture of a controlled substance— marijuana — and possession of marijuana with intent to deliver. We reverse, finding that the officers unconstitutionally obtained the information supporting the search warrant by surreptitiously entering onto the defendant’s property. Thus, the evidence must be suppressed, the case dismissed, and the judgment and sentence vacated.

Bridgewater, J.

A. General History

¶2 The State charged Peter Littlefair on March 1, 1996, with manufacture of a controlled substance — marijuana— and possession with intent to…