Legal Opinion
Sleeper v. URS Midwest, Inc.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided September 28, 2018No. Case No. 3:17-cv-00071-SLGPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Sharon L. Gleason, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
*409Before the Court at Docket 35 is Defendant URS Midwest, Inc.'s ("URS") Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff William Sleeper opposed at Docket 40. URS replied at Docket 44. Oral argument was held on April 30, 2018, at Anchorage, Alaska, before Judge Sharon L. Gleason.1
BACKGROUND
URS provides vehicle transportation services for customers in the United States and Canada.2 Its Alaska drivers continue the transportation of vehicles that have been shipped to Alaska, delivering them to customers in Fairbanks, Prudhoe Bay, and other locations within the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lane v. United Road Services MidwestDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019