Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dawson v. Hatfield Wire & Cable Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 26, 1971Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEkastcis, J.

I agree with the result announced by my colleagues but I cannot accept the basis upon which it was reached. The opinion accepts the fact that Dawson had a living lawful wife at the time he entered into the ceremonial marriage with the petitioner. Although the second marriage was therefore void, the majority characterize the relationship of petitioner and Willie Dawson as a de facto relationship of husband and wife, and they regard petitioner’s status as that of a de facto wife. Thus there comes into existence a quasi-marital status which was hitherto unknown to, and in fact contrary to, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. ElderTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Marcum v. ZaringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Harper v. DupreeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  4. Amanda C. Yarbrough v. United States, and Reginald Daniely, 1 Alvin B. Martin and Mary Lee Smith, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  5. Dunn v. O'Day, New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API