Legal Opinion

In re the Interdiction of Armstrong

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 3, 1992No. 92-C-0139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Granted. The record reflects that on July 22, 1986, the curator moved the trial court to appoint Ronald Armstrong as un-dercurator because “Veronica Noble Cas-cante has resigned her position as undercu-ratrix and it is necessary this court appoint an undercurator herein.” The trial court on the same day appointed Ronald Armstrong as undercurator of the interdict. Although the order did not state expressly that Veronica Noble was removed or that Ronald Armstrong was appointed in her place, we think the order was intended and therefore implicitly had this effect because this was the only reason…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Noble v. ArmstrongLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Noble v. ArmstrongLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API