Legal Opinion

Edelman v. Lee Optical Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 22, 1974No. 59998PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Drucker

Plaintiffs, individually and as class representatives, filed an amended complaint alleging essentially the use of misleading merchandising techniques by defendants. Defendants moved to strike and dismiss. The court below found that the suit was “not properly maintainable as a class action” and struck the amended complaint, granting leave “to the five named plaintiffs to file an amended complaint stating their individual claims for relief against defendants.” This plaintiffs failed to do, electing to stand on their class claim, and the suit was dismissed.

On appeal plaintiffs raise three…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. SpragueIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Peoples Store of Roseland v. McKibbinIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hagerty v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Newberry Library v. Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Rice v. Snarlin, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Life Insurance Co. of Southwest v. BristerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Brooks v. Midas-International Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Carroll v. Cellco PartnershipNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  4. In Re Woodward & Lothrop Holdings, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  5. Midway Tobacco Co. v. MahinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API