Legal Opinion

State v. Neis

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1912No. 10171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered September 30, 1911, upon a trial and conviction of larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

The state filed and caused to be certified by the trial judge a supplemental statement of facts, in which it is shown that no exceptions were taken to the instructions of the court prior to the time the jury retired to consider of their verdict. The defendant has moved to strike this supplemental record. The motion will be denied. The supplemental record is immaterial, and does not deprive defendant of any right of review in this case. The exceptions were taken immediately after the jury retired. This was a compliance with the statute. Rem. & Bal. Code, § 339. Coffey v. Seattle Elec. Co., 39…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. HubbardWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Coffey v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MossWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State v. NeisWashington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API