Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Battle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 8, 2005PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

¶ 1 Appellant Battle appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Post Conviction Relief Act 1 (PCRA) petition. Through PCRA counsel, he raises two allegations of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. He has also petitioned for remand for appointment of new PCRA counsel, alleging ineffective assistance. We deny his petition for remand and affirm the court’s denial of his PCRA petition.

¶2 On October 4, 2001, appellant was convicted by jury of two counts of possession of cocaine and two counts of possession with intent to deliver cocaine. 2 The charges stemmed…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RathfonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. BozicSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Com. v. Allen, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Amoop, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API