Loudermilk v. Associates Discount Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
This is the second appearance of this case in this court. On the former appearance, Loudermilk v. Associates Discount Corp., 107 Ga. App. 574 (130 SE2d 831), it was held that the trial court erred in overruling the certiorari because the debtor made out a prima facie defense against the plaintiff’s action, and there was no evidence introduced by the plaintiff or the defendant to overcome such prima facie case. Upon the return of the remittitur to the superior court the judgment rendered thereon was “that the writ of certiorari be sustained with judgment for plaintiff,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holmes v. Pye & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Whiddon v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Dorsey v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Tuten v. TowlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Loudermilk v. Associates Discount Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963