Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. M. J. H.

Clatsop County Circuit Court, Oregon

Decided June 2, 2016No. 14JU03564; A160542 (Control), A160553; 14JU03566; A160544, A160555; 14JU03565; A160546, A160554PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShore, J.

Mother and father appeal from judgments of the juvenile court that changed the permanency plans for their three children from reunification to adoption. Mother and father both challenge the court’s conclusions that the Department of Human Services (DHS) had made reasonable efforts to reunify the family and that mother had not made sufficient progress to enable the children to return home.1 They also both argue that the juvenile court erred in changing the permanency plans to adoption, while in a separate dependency case involving the same three children, the plans remained reunification.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. W. A. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Department of Human Services v. D. L. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. L. P. L. O.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Department of Human Services v. M. A. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Dep't of Human Servs. v. M. A. H. (In re T. M. H.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API