Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 5, 1927No. 11035PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge. —

The offense is pandering, the punishment confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

It is appellant’s contention that the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction because the state’s witness, Onie Paris, is an accomplice, and is uncorroborated. The state’s witness, Onie Paris, testified, in substance, that she and her husband, Cecil Paris, were on the sidewalk in the town of Farmersville, when appellant drove up and called her husband out to the car, where they had a conversation which she could not hear. According to her testimony, after talking to her husband,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deatherage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Denman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Denman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Threlkeld v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API