Legal Opinion
Thomas Quarles v. Colorado Security Agency, Inc
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 8, 1988No. 86-7019PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
Appellant Thomas Quarles claims that he was impermissibly discharged by his employer, Colorado Security Agency (Colorado), in retaliation for reporting alleged “inaccuracies” in log reports Colorado submitted to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in connection with a contract the Company had to perform services at a HUD-owned building. He seeks from his ex-employer reinstatement and compensatory and punitive damages. The District Court dismissed Quarles’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and because, as an at-will-employee, Quarles had no…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Barbara J. Eatmon v. Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Inc., Barbara J. Eatmon, Cross-Appellees v. Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Inc., Cross-Appellant. Barbara J. Eatmon v. Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Lodge 1858, American Federation of Government Employees v. Administrator, National Aeronautics & Space AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
- Lodge 1858, American Federation of Government Employees v. James E. Webb, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lodge 1858, American Federation of Government Employees v. James E. Webb, Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Appeal of National Council of Technical Service IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
4Cited by2 opinions
- Alibalogun v. First Coast Security Solutions, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Sylvia Bolden v. Matthew Anderson et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026