Legal Opinion
Godinez v. Sullivan-Lackey
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 20, 2004No. 1-02-2101PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE CAMPBELL
delivered the opinion of the court:
Defendants, June E. Sullivan-Lackey and the City of Chicago Commission on Human Relations (the Commission), appeal from an order of the circuit court of Cook County reversing the determination of the Commission that the refusal of plaintiffs, Julio Godinez and Carlos Godinez, to rent an apartment to Sullivan-Lackey constituted discrimination in violation of the City of Chicago Fair Housing Ordinance (Chicago Municipal Code § 5 — 8—030 (2003)) (Fair Housing Ordinance). On appeal, defendants contend that: (1) section 8 rental…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- People v. WoodardIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Russell v. Department of Natural ResourcesIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Sundance Homes, Inc. v. County of Du PageIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Franklin Tower One, L.L.C. v. N.M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Montgomery County v. Glenmont Hills Associates Privacy WorldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Gaston v. CHAC, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- MIFAB, Inc. v. Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
- Austin Apartment Ass'n v. City of AustinDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
- Powell v. City of Chicago Human Rights CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.