Legal Opinion

In re Bankston

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 29, 2001No. 2001-B-1352PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

| ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.

PER CURIAM *

This attorney disciplinary matter stems from two sets of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Clayton V. Bankston, an attorney licensed in Louisiana.

UNDERLYING FACTS

Sears Matter

In July 1996, respondent issued two checks in the respective amounts of $400 and $425 to the Village Gallery and Frame Shoppe in Pleasant Valley, New York. Subsequently, respondent’s bank returned the checks for insufficient funds. Respondent failed to satisfy his debt, despite numerous promises to do so. As a result,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In re VaughanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  4. In Re KendrickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  5. In Re PowersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. In re RandolphSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  3. In re BankstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API