Legal Opinion

Cornerstone Investment, Inc. v. Cannon Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 2000No. Docket 197297PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

White, RJ.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. 459 Mich 905 (1998). Plaintiff challenged defendants’ Escrow Application Policy, which required, as a precondition to defendants’ review and processing of planned unit development (pud) rezoning applications, that developers place funds in escrow from which Cannon Township is reimbursed for expenses incurred in processing and reviewing applications for compliance with its zoning ordinance. The circuit court granted defendants’ motion for summary disposition. In a split opinion, this Court reversed. Cornerstone Investments, Inc…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Merrelli v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Burt Township v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Detroit Edison Co. v. Township of RichmondMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. A & B Enterprises v. Madison TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Flama Const. Corp. v. Tp. of FranklinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frens Orchards, Inc v. Dayton Township BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API