Legal Opinion

Belcher v. Moises

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1987No. B021850PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LUI, J.

Appellant Berenice Moisés filed a will contest challenging the validity of an addition to a holographic codicil to the will of her uncle, Earl Archer. Archer’s cousin, Donald Belcher, and Belcher’s nominee to administer Archer’s estate, Dickinson Thatcher (respondents), filed a general demurrer to the contest. After a hearing, the demurrer was sustained without leave to amend, the contest was dismissed, and the challenged codicil was admitted to probate. Moisés appeals.

We conclude that, as a matter of law, the addition to the codicil adopts the signature of the original codicil.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Crosby v. Crockeranglo National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Goldberg v. BlochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of ArcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API