Belcher v. Moises
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LUI, J.
Appellant Berenice Moisés filed a will contest challenging the validity of an addition to a holographic codicil to the will of her uncle, Earl Archer. Archer’s cousin, Donald Belcher, and Belcher’s nominee to administer Archer’s estate, Dickinson Thatcher (respondents), filed a general demurrer to the contest. After a hearing, the demurrer was sustained without leave to amend, the contest was dismissed, and the challenged codicil was admitted to probate. Moisés appeals.
We conclude that, as a matter of law, the addition to the codicil adopts the signature of the original codicil.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Estate of WunderleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Crosby v. Crockeranglo National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Goldberg v. BlochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of ArcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987