Legal Opinion

Frank v. Hollands

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 16, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from, Osceola District Court. — Hon. C. H. Lewis, Judge. Action to recover the amount of a promissory note, and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. A decree was rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHobinson, J.

The note in suit purports to have been given for ninety-three dollars and thirteen cents by the defendant, James Hollands. It was given for lightning rods erected upon a dwelling-house owned by his wife and codefendant, Huida Hollands. Plaintiff asks judgment for the amount of the note against both of said defendants, and the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien on the building and land upon which it is located. The answer of Halda Hollands is a general denial. James Hollands alleges in his answer that the note as originally drawn and signed was for thirteen dollars, and that since it was made it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hobart v. HobartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First National Bank in Sioux City v. CurranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Smith v. WellslagerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Royal Lumber Co. v. HoelznerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. Klopp v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Willverding v. OffineerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API