M.A. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
M.A. challenges his commitment to a level 8 program. Finding that the circuit court had jurisdiction over appellant at the time of the commitment, we affirm.
On August 18, 2004, M.A. entered pleas of guilty or no contest in eight cases. He was adjudicated delinquent and placed in a Level 6 moderate risk commitment. The preprinted, form disposition order stated:
The placement is for an indeterminate period, but no longer than 5 years or the child’s 19th birthday, or as expected in section 985.201(4)(b) 1 and 2, whichever comes first.[1]
Upon release, the child shall be placed on post-commitment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crill v. State Road DepartmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- S.L.K. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Partridge v. PartridgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Cesaire v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Vl Orlando Building Corp. v. Agd Hosp. Design & Purchasing, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.