Legal Opinion
Bell v. The Florence S.
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided March 8, 1915No. 2060Published
1Opinion of the Court
BUNNELL, District Judge.
Kittie M. Hensley appeared as claimant and defendant in the above-entitled action in admiralty and filed exceptions to the libel of William Bell, libelant, as follows :
“First, that the matter contained in article ‘first’ of the libel herein is impertinent and surplusage, and indefinite and uncertain, and fails to disclose any hiring whereby libelant can recover anything in this action; second, that the matter contained in article ‘seventh' of the libel herein is impertinent and surplusage, and gives the libel-ant no lien upon the property attached herein, and recovery…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. The SiriusDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1895
- Brig E. A. BarnardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1880
- The SinaloaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1913
- Jepson v. The AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1893
- Davidson v. PlummerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.