Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Roth
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 2, 1980No. Nos. 79-2171, 79-2285PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge:
Jimmy Lee Hamilton, the appellant, suffers from a recurrent growth on his penis known as an intraurethral condyloma acu-minatum of Buschke and Lowenstein. Such condylomas resemble in appearance large warts. He first developed this growth while serving in the Marines. It reappeared shortly before he was incarcerated in the Pennsylvania State Correctional Institution at Graterford. The military doctors were rather more attentive to his problem than those at Graterford. Indeed, in the two months he spent at Graterford, Hamilton’s repeated requests for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Patzig v. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Bradshaw v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Ochoa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Samuel Weaver and Alice Weaver v. Marine BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Vincent MOODIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.