Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rink v. Richland Memorial Hospital

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 21, 1992No. 23719Published

1Dissent

Toal, Justice:

I respectfully dissent. The legislative goal in providing a longer, three-year statute of limitations for those who have first filed a claim with the governmental entity was clearly to encourage claimants to attempt informal resolution of their claim. As a less costly procedure, it benefits both the claimant and the governmental entity but it provides an additional benefit to the governmental entity in that the entity receives early notification of pending claims. The verified claim must be filed with the entity within one year of the loss occurred or when it should have been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cochran v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. Braudie v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API