Mason v. . the People
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
It seems to have been considered, by all the authorities, before the Revised Statutes, both in England and in this State, that in an indictment for burglary it was necessary, not only to aver that the prisoner broke and entered the premises with intent to commit a felony, but to state what felony he intended. And the intent must have been correctly stated; for, if the entry was alleged to be with the intent to commit one kind of felony, and the evidence showed that another was designed, the prisoner could not be convicted. (1 Hale Pl. Cor., 561; 2 East. Pl. Crown, 514; 3 Chit. Cr. L., 1098.)…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. PhelpsNew York Supreme Court · 1830
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sanders v. DixonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Levy v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Smith v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
- Flanagan v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.