Legal Opinion

B&P Littleford, LLC v. Prescott Machine, LLC and Ray Miller

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 31, 2025No. 1:25-cv-13348Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION B&P LITTLEFORD, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:25-cv-13348 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington United States District Judge PRESCOTT MACHINE, LLC, and RAY MILLER, Defendants. _______________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Plaintiff B&P Littleford designs and builds industrial equipment and produces technical drawings of the product designs to, among other things, preserve and protect their work product. It protects these technical drawings by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Certified Restoration Dry Cleaning Network, L.L.C. v. Tenke Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. First Technology Safety Systems, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. Paul Depinet Steven Fuhr Barry Wade Vector Research, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. ABX Air, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline DivisionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API