Legal Opinion

Union National Bank & Trust Co. of Elgin v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 13, 1956No. Docket No. 55572PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Haekon, Judge:

It is provided in section 23 (k) .(1) of the 1939 Code that deduction may be taken for debts which become worthless within a taxable year, “or (within the discretion of the Commissioner) a reasonable addition to a reserve for bad debts.” The petitioner, with permission of the Commissioner, changed from the specific charge-off method of treating its bad debts for income tax purposes to the reserve for bad debt method in 1942. In C. P. Ford & Co., Inc., 28 B. T. A. 156, 158, 159, this Court pointed out that if a taxpayer chooses to use the reserve for bad debt method of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. First Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. American State Bank, a Wisconsin Banking Corporation v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  2. Newlin Machinery Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
  3. Miners Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  4. First Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  5. American State Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API