Legal Opinion
Loe v. United States
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided June 29, 1982No. Crim. A. No. 75-344-A, Civ. A. No. 79-907-AMPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MERHIGE, District Judge.
Petitioner Richard C. Loe (“Loe”) brings this proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 challenging the validity of his federal conviction and sentence on the ground that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at his trial.
On August 23,1977, Loe was convicted by a jury of the October 22, 1975 robbery of the Annandale, Virginia office of the Clarendon Bank and Trust Company in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). At this trial, Loe was represented by counsel who had been appointed at his March 11, 1977 rearraignment.
Loe’s conviction was affirmed by the Court…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gary Leroy Profitt v. George R. Waldron, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Wilcoxson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- State v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Dill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- People v. MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.