Transatlantic Bulk Shipping Ltd. v. Saudi Chartering S.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LEVAL, District Judge.
This is a motion by plaintiff for sanctions arising from defendants’ continued failure to produce numerous demanded documents in violation of three court orders. Plaintiff, Transatlantic Bulk Shipping, Ltd. (successor Ascanius Transportation Corp.) moves pursuant to Rule 37(b) Fed.R.Civ.P., to strike defendants’ answer and motion to dismiss.1 I find plaintiff is entitled to sanctions. Defendants have simply thumbed their noses at their obligations. They have produced only a small number of documents and have done so only after great delay and in instances only after…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cine Forty-Second Street Theatre Corp. v. Allied Artists Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States Freight Company, as Successor in Interest of International Forwarding Co. v. Penn Central Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Life Music, Inc. v. Broadcast Music, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Conway v. DunbarDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Kansas v. EMPIRE CITY SUBWAY CO.(LTD.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2010